Legal Opinion
United States v. Abrams
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 13, 1982No. 82 Cr. 80 (CES)PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
STEWART, District Judge:
Defendants Martin Abrams, Irving Cotier, Michael Gold, Frederick Pierce, and Leonard Siegel are jointly charged with fifteen counts of wire fraud, and one count of endeavoring to obstruct the communication of information regarding a federal criminal offense. In addition, defendant Abrams is charged with another count of obstructing a criminal investigation, and one count of tax fraud; defendant Siegel is charged with endeavoring to obstruct a grand jury investigation and one count of tax fraud; and defendant Gold is charged with two counts of tax…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- United States v. John WalshCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. FeolaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- United States v. David RomanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. UptonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- United States v. VastolaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.