Lawson Supply Co. v. General Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
Utah Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHenriod, Justice
(concurring and dissenting) :
I concur in that part of the decision adjudging Lawson to have been a material-man under the statute, but respectfully dissent from that part adjudging that the expense of depositions is assessable as costs. I think this latter conclusion is a product of none of this court’s business, amounts to judicial legislation, and is bottomed on no legitimate authority save our own ipse dix-it.
There were no assessable costs at common law.1 They are strictly statutory.2 There is absolutely nothing in our statutes having to do with depositions being assessable as costs. There…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Holland v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1964
- Openshaw v. OpenshawUtah Supreme Court · 1932
- Hawkins v. PerryUtah Supreme Court · 1953
- Checketts v. CollingsUtah Supreme Court · 1931
- Rickenberg v. Capitol GarageUtah Supreme Court · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.