Legal Opinion

Broast v. Interstate Surety Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1925No. File Nos. 5506, 5507, 5613PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This proceeding involves three separate appeals arising’ out of the same case below. It appears that plaintiff’s father died intestate, and plaintiff’s mother, Eva Schaeffer, was appointed administratrix of decedent’s estate by the county court of Yankton county in October, 1919, and as a condition precedent to issuance of letters of administration to her she furnished and hied a bond in the sum of $2,000 executed by the Interstate Surety Company. The assets of the estate appear to have consisted of 120 acres of land in Yankton county. Several months later the administratrix petitioned the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Irwin v. BackusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Gaines v. WhiteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Treweek v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Longley v. DalySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Central Banking & Security Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1913

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hoverstad v. First National Bank and Trust Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  2. In Re Requa's EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  3. American Surety Co. v. Western Surety Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Campbell v. DuncanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Ark of Refuge Rest Home Corp. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API