Legal Opinion

Davis v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 4, 1984No. 82-1290, 82-1301PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Chief Judge:

Davis and Kemper were convicted of carrying a pistol without a license. D.C. Code § 22-3204 (1981). They assert several grounds for reversal, only one of which has merit. 1 We find that the trial court violated appellant Davis’ Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights to due process and to present witnesses in his defense by improperly sustaining a claimed Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination by a witness called by Davis. We affirm the conviction of Kemper and remand the record as to Davis for further proceedings.

Davis and Kemper were stopped in a yellow Chevette…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Mason v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Martin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Sykes v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Flores v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Jaggers v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API