Legal Opinion
Board of Managers of Mews v. Farajzadeh
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided June 14, 2001PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order unanimously modified by dismissing plaintiffs first cause of action and, as so modified, affirmed without costs.
By its second and third causes of action, which are duplicative, plaintiff seeks judgment for “an amount exceeding $12,080.30” for unpaid common charges (through May 1997), late charges, interest, accelerated charges and other charges.
Plaintiff moved for summary judgment against defendant for the sum of $22,985.39, which included moneys for common charges defendant failed to pay through September 1999 (and which were not demanded in its…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Frisch v. Bellmarc Management, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Marine Midland Bank, N. A. v. BowkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Tommasi v. ArchibaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Board of Managers of the 200 West 109 Condominium v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Board of Managers of the Mews at North Hills Condominium v. FarajzadehNassau County District Court · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Andrew Carothers, M.D., P.C. v. Progressive InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2013
- Bay Crest Ass'n v. PaarAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2015
- Board of Mgrs. of Villas on the Lake Condominium v. PolicicchioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
- Delson Communications v. MTI/Image Group, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2005
- Drew v. Sylvan Learning Center Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.