Frisch v. Bellmarc Management, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ross, J.
The only issue presented on this appeal is whether Real Property Law § 235-b, the statutory warranty of habitability, is applicable to the relationship between the board of managers of a condominium and an individual unit owner. It is clear that tenant-shareholders in a cooperative can rely on section *385235-b in actions against the cooperative corporation (see generally, Department of Hous. Preservation & Dev. v Sartor, 109 AD2d 665; also see, Caspi v Madison 79 Assocs., 85 AD2d 583; Suarez v Rivercross Tenants’ Corp., 107 Misc 2d 135). However, we are informed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schoninger v. Yardarm Beach Homeowners' Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- All Seasons Resorts, Inc. v. AbramsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Suarez v. Rivercross Tenants' Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1981
- Department of Housing Preservation & Development v. SartorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Halkedis v. Two East End Avenue Apartment Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Caprer v. NussbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Guryev v. TomchinskyNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- Granada Condominium I v. MorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Agassiz West Condominium Ass'n v. SolumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Devlin v. 645 First Avenue Manhattan Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.