Legal Opinion

MacDonald & Payne Machine Co. v. Metallic Arts of New England, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 6, 1949PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

These are two actions of contract which were tried together. In one action MacDonald and Payne Machine Company, Inc. (hereinafter called MacDonald), seeks to recover from Metallic Arts of New England, Inc. (hereinafter called Metallic), under count 1 of its declaration the sum of $1,948 for labor and materials as set forth in its account annexed; in its second count recovery of the same amount is sought as a balance due under an alleged contract to make certain dies for Metallic. Both counts are for the same cause of action. In the other action, which arises out of the same transaction,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Reid v. DohertyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  2. Weiner v. D. A. Schulte, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Pacheco v. MedeirosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Garfield v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  5. Lander v. Samuel Heller Leather Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bushkin Associates, Inc. And Merle J. Bushkin v. Raytheon CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  2. Cataldo v. ZuckermanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  3. Mayer v. Boston Metropolitan Airport, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  4. Dynamic Machine Works, Inc. v. Machine & Electrical Consultants, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  5. H. Piken & Co., Inc. v. Planet Constr. Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API