Legal Opinion

Dynamic Machine Works, Inc. v. Machine & Electrical Consultants, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 28, 2005PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCordy, J.

A judge of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts has certified the following question: “Under the Massachusetts version of the Uniform Commercial Code, does a buyer have a right to retract a written extension allowing more time for the seller to cure defects in a delivered product absent reliance on the extension by the seller?”1 We answer the certified question as follows: If the written extension constitutes a modification of the agreement to purchase the product, then the buyer may not retract it unilaterally. If, on the other hand, the written extension…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cochran v. Quest Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  2. Wisconsin Knife Works v. National Metal CraftersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. BMC Industries, Inc. v. Barth Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  4. Sargent v. Tenaska, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  5. Boston Helicopter Charter, Inc. v. Agusta Aviation Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. TAL Financial Corp. v. CSC Consulting, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  2. Bortolotti v. HaydenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  3. Best Buy Stores, L.P. v. Benderson-Wainberg Associates, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  4. Bachorz v. Miller-ForslundCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  5. Best Buy Stores, L.P. v. Developers Diversified Realty Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API