Legal Opinion

McSparran v. Kingston Contracting Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 2, 1963No. Civ. A. Nos. 31436, 31437PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GRIM, District Judge.

In these cases in which jurisdiction is founded only on diversity of citizenship, plaintiff administratrix resides in New Jersey, and the other plaintiffs reside in Connecticut; defendant Kingston Contracting Co., Inc., is a resident of Pennsylvania and defendants Herbert and Stout are residents of West Virginia. Defendants Herbert and Stout have filed motions to dismiss under the venue statute 28 U.S.C.A. § 1391:

“(a) A civil action wherein jurisdiction is founded only on diversity of citizenship may * * * be brought only in the judicial district where all plaintiffs or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. Wharf ConstructersDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1962
  2. Jurgelis v. Southern Motors Express, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. United Nations Korean Reconstruction Agency v. Glass Production Methods, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  4. Evans v. RushingDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Prescott-Harris v. McHughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API