Legal Opinion
Stringfield v. City of Hackensack
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 26, 1961PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
68 N.J. Super. 38 (1961)
171 A.2d 361
DORIS CARLSEN STRINGFIELD, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
THE CITY OF HACKENSACK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 2, 1961.
Decided May 26, 1961.
Before Judges CONFORD, FBEUND and KILKENNY.
Mr. William R. Morrison argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Morrison, Lloyd & Griggs, attorneys).
Mr. Harry Chashin argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Marcus & Levy, attorneys; Mr. Chashin, of counsel).
The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND, J.A.D.
This appeal by the City…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- City of Trenton v. LenznerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- McSorley v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Britt v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- N. J. Good Humor, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners of Bradley BeachSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
- Cloyes v. Township of DelawareSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Harrigan v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Gillot v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1981
- Caporossi v. Atlantic City, New JerseyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1963
- Valvano v. BD. OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF UNION COUNTYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.