Legal Opinion

Morgan v. . Turnage Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 13, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Tbe defendant appealed from an order of tbe court below making additional parties defendant. Tbe power of tbe judge to make additional parties to an action is well settled, and it does not appear that tbe order appealed from will change tbe cause of action or work injustice to tbe appellant. Tillery v. Candler, 118 N. C., 888, 24 S. E., 709; Mills v. Callahan, 126 N. C., 756, 36 S. E., 164; Bernard v. Shemwell, 139 N. C., 446, 52 S. E., 64; Joyner v. Fiber Co., 178 N. C., 634, 101 S. E., 373; Barbee v. Cannady, 191 N. C., 529, 132 S. E., 281; Wilmington v. Board of Education, 210 N. C., 197,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bernard v. Shemwell.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Barbee v. . CannadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. City of Wilmington v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Joyner v. Champion Fiber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. State v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Raleigh v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Burgess v. TrevathanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Service Fire Insurance v. Horton Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Bright v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Bright v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API