Sneider v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
OLGA JURCO, United States Magistrate.
Plaintiff and defendant have filed cross-motions to compel discovery. Each is resisting discovery through assertions of the attorney-client and work product privileges. Since this suit concerns the claim of privilege in a corporate and patent context, special emphasis will be placed upon the developing law of privilege in those areas. After a general survey of the law of privilege, the defendant’s privilege claims will be examined and then the plaintiff’s.
A. THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
The attorney client privilege is designed to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Diversified Industries, Inc. v. The Honorable James H. Meredith, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- In Re Spalding Sports Worldwide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Pacamor Bearings, Inc. v. Minebea Co., Ltd.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
- Leonen v. Johns-ManvilleDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
- Detection Systems, Inc. v. Pittway Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1982
- RBS Citizens, N.A. v. HusainDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.