Legal Opinion
Comair Rotron, Inc. v. Minebea Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 23, 1992No. M8-85 (RWS)PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Minebea Co., Ltd., Nippon Miniature Bearing Corporation and NMB Technologies (USA), Inc. (collectively, “Minebea”) has moved pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 37(a)(4) for an order compelling the further oral examination of non-party witnesses attorneys Thomas MacBlain (“MacBlain”), Arthur Tenser (“Tenser”) and Peter J. Phillips (“Phillips”) (collectively, the “Deponents”) and compelling the production of documents and things responsive to the subpoenas previously served on them. Plaintiff Comair Rotron, Inc. (“Rotron”) has moved to dismiss the motion to compel.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- Sporck v. PeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Henry v. Champlain Enterprises, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2003
- Lugosch v. CongelDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2003
- Madanes v. MadanesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- NXIVM Corp. v. O'HaraDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2007
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.