Legal Opinion
Hoeker v. Department of Social & Rehabilitation Services
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided November 28, 2000No. 99-260PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff Kathleen Hoeker appeals from an order of the Windsor Superior Court granting defendant Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services (SRS) summary judgment on her claim for damages against SRS. This dispute arises out of a contract between plaintiff and SRS for plaintiff to serve as a foster parent. Plaintiff claims that SRS was negligent in breaching the contract by failing to provide wraparound services. We affirm.
In December 1989, plaintiff began serving as a foster parent for J.E S., a juvenile previously adjudged to be a child in need of care or supervision (CHINS) under 33…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lamoille Grain Co. v. St. Johnsbury & Lamoille County RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
- Dartmouth Savings Bank v. F.O.S. AssociatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- Baker v. Town of GoshenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Lapoint v. Dumont Construction CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
- Housing Vermont v. Goldsmith & MorrisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Phillip v. Marsh-MonsantoSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
- In Re Town Highway No. 20Supreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- Kneebinding, Inc., John Springer-Miller, Tina Springer-Miller and ACL Investments, LLC v. Richard HowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- Field v. CostaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- State Street Associates, L.P. v. New York State Urban Development Corp. (In Re State Street Associates, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.