Legal Opinion

Dicks v. Jensen

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 9, 2001No. 00-102PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

Plaintiff James Dicks appeals from an order of the Windham Superior Court granting summary judgment to defendants Cary and Brenda Jensen. Plaintiff claims that defendants violated the Vermont Trade Secrets Act, 9 V.S.A §§ 4601-4609, when they left plaintiffs employ at the Lodge at Mount Snow and solicited the Lodge’s bus tour customers to start their own lodge in Bennington, Vermont. Plaintiff also alleges that defendants breached a fiduciary duty, the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and intentionally interfered with business relations. We affirm.

Plaintiff has owned the Lodge at…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Fred Siegel Co., L.P.A. v. Arter & HaddenOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Leo Silfen, Inc. v. CreamNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Jet Spray Cooler, Inc. v. CramptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  4. Ross v. Times Mirror, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  5. Hollingsworth Solderless Terminal Co., a Corporation v. William Turley, an Individual and Hoffman Electronics Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Alpine Haven Property Owners Ass'n v. DeptulaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  2. Catalyst & Chemical Services, Inc. v. Global Ground SupportDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  3. Zemco Manufacturing, Inc. v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. LoPresti v. Rutland Regional Health Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  5. City of Burlington v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API