Legal Opinion

Myers v. Dixon

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 27, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Debt on a Replevin Bond. —Appeal from the Circuit Court of Livingston County; the Hon. George W. Patton, Judge presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1902.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Higbee

Appellant G. H. Myers, on June 4, 1901, sued out a writ of replevin against Samuel C. Barber, to recover possession of a calf valued at $15. On the following day he and the' other appellants herein executed a replevin bond to R J. Dixon, a constable, for twice the value of the property, conditioned according to law. Upon the trial before the justice of the peace, the jury found “ no cause of action ” and the justice gave a judgment against Myers for the costs. He appealed to the Circuit Court, but afterward dismissed his appeal, and judgment was there entered,in favor of Barber and against…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Italian-Swiss Agricultural Colony v. PeaseIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Vinyard v. BarnesIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Bowden v. BowdenIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Reno v. WoodyattAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
  5. Fellheimer v. HainlineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. HewittIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Azar v. Statewide Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API