Legal Opinion

Azar v. Statewide Insurance Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 4, 1997No. 2-96-0640Published

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE GEIGER

delivered the opinion of the court:

Saul Azar, the plaintiff in this cause, brought an action on a replevin bond against the defendant, Statewide Insurance Company (Statewide). See 735 ILCS 5/19 — 127 (West 1994). Statewide was the surety, on the bond, which had been posted in the amount of $6,000. The trial court granted Statewide’s motion to dismiss, and the plaintiff timely appeals. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Azar’s complaint, filed on December 29, 1995, alleged that he had been named as the defendant in a prior replevin action filed by his former…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Union Trust Co. v. ShoemakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Vinyard v. BarnesIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Petrie v. FisherIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Danford v. WatkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Franks v. MatsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API