Legal Opinion
In Re: Jay Alan Rothstein. Joergen Helmer Hagman v. Glen E. Robinson, United States Marshal for the Northern District of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 5, 1989No. 89-15215PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Jay Alan Rothstein attempts to substitute as counsel of record on behalf of appellant Joergen Helmer Hagman in Hag-man’s appeal from the denial of his federal habeas corpus petition. Rothstein does not qualify for admission to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and was admitted to practice in error. We vacate Rothstein’s admission to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and this court’s order granting his substitution as attorney of record.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Rothstein was admitted to practice before the High Court of the Trust Territory of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sablan Construction Co. v. Government of the Trust Territory of the Pacific IslandsDistrict Court, Northern Mariana Islands · 1981
- Thompson v. KleppeDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1976
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gushi Brothers Company Chuji G. Chutaro Beverly L. Chutaro v. Bank of GuamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Lebrón-CaceresDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2016
- In re Admission of UngerUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2002