Legal Opinion

In re Admission of Unger

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided July 29, 2002No. 02-8001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

Before the Court is the application of Gere Unger for admission to the bar of this Court. Pursuant to Rule 46 of this Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, an attorney “of good moral character and repute” may be admitted to this Court’s bar if he or she “has been admitted to practice in the Supreme Court of the United States, or the highest court of any state, the District of Columbia, or a territory, possession, or commonwealth of the United States, and is in good standing therein.” U.S. VetApp. R. 46(a). In support of his application for admission, the applicant submitted only a…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cherokee Nation v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  2. Mary Jane WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas David MARCHINGTON; Inland Empire Shows, Inc., Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. Romanella v. HaywardDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
  4. In Re: Jay Alan Rothstein. Joergen Helmer Hagman v. Glen E. Robinson, United States Marshal for the Northern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Juliana De Guzman v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
  2. Anthony R. McGee, Jr. v. Robert L. WilkieUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2019
  3. Juliana De Guzman v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API