Legal Opinion

United States v. Schmitt

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 28, 1986No. Nos. 85-5106 to 85-5110PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEANEY, Circuit Judge.

Wilhelm Schmitt, Ernest Foust, Roger Luther, and Harry Mott appeal from jury verdicts finding them guilty of numerous criminal offenses under Titles 18 and 26 of the United States Code. On appeal, they contend that the district court (1) lacked personal and subject matter jurisdiction, (2) erred in denying their demands to be represented by lay counsel, and (3) violated the Speedy Trial Act of 1974, § 101, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(c)(1). We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND.

Schmitt, Foust, and Luther were charged with numerous criminal offenses, tried together before a jury, and convicted on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. Paul M. Drefke, United States of America v. Richard O. JamesonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. Robert E. SpurgeonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. Edward W. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hiram Eugene Meyer v. Willis Sargent, Warden, Arkansas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. Joseph LussierCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Kenneth J. MasatCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Tommie Perris Crawford, Also Known as "Baby Crip,"Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Daniel Lee WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API