Hiram Eugene Meyer v. Willis Sargent, Warden, Arkansas Department of Corrections
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HANSON, Senior District Judge.
Hiram Eugene Meyer appeals the District Court’s 1 dismissal of his habeas corpus petition. Meyer asserts that he was denied due process and equal protection of the law by: (1) being subjected to double jeopardy; (2) being denied his sixth amendment right to assistance of counsel at trial; and (3) being denied effective assistance of appellate counsel. We affirm the decision of the district court for the reasons discussed below.
FACTS
In reviewing appellant’s claims we find those related to the claim of double jeopardy to be entirely without merit. Accordingly we…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Patterson v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- United States v. Jose EspinoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- State v. CrisafiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- United States v. SwinneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Gerald Lee PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Alberto Castro (89-1528), Ignacio Forte (89-1530), Guillermo Rocha (89-1531), Jaime Giraldo (89-1893), Norberto Giraldo (89-1894)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.