Legal Opinion

United States v. Tommie Perris Crawford, Also Known as "Baby Crip,"

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 6, 2007No. 06-3464 to 06-3466PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MELLOY, Circuit Judge.

After his conviction on gun and drug offenses, Tommie Perris Crawford received permission from the district court 1 to proceed pro se at sentencing. On appeal, Crawford argues the district court erred in allowing him to represent himself without first obtaining a competency evaluation. Crawford also contends he did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to counsel and therefore his Sixth Amendment right to counsel was violated. For the reasons stated below, we affirm Crawford’s conviction and sentence.

I. BACKGROUND

A grand jury indicted Crawford for three felony…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. LadoucerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Carlous HortonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  5. People v. BurgenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API