Legal Opinion

Beyerlein v. Whitcomb

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1933No. 7,101PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

The plaintiff, Jane E. Beyerlein, has appealed from a judgment of nonsuit, entered in favor of the defendants, John E. Whitcomb and Amelia Mosher, in her action for damages for conversion of certain personal property.

On December 29, 1927, there was issued out of the district court of Lewis and Clark county an execution which recites the entry of judgment, in favor of Whitcomb and against this plaintiff, for the possession of certain lands. The mandate to the sheriff is that he “deliver the possession of said real property” to Whitcomb. The sheriff’s return to the writ is that, on February 11,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Page v. PuyIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Stearns v. VincentMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Whitcomb v. BeyerleinMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Smith v. PrettyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Miller v. WhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Evans v. Carroll & Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1957
  2. Foster v. First National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API