Legal Opinion
Vargas v. Doe
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 5, 2006PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
In our review of this expedited petition arising from a civil action brought against the parents of a minor child, we address the application of § 11-20A of our rules of practice for the first time. In his petition, the plaintiff, Alfredo Vargas, challenges the *401order of the trial court allowing the use of pseudonyms by the defendants.1 We conclude that we have jurisdiction and grant the relief requested because the court failed to comply with the dictates of § 11-20A.2 We therefore vacate the court’s order permitting the defendants to proceed by use of pseudonyms and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- State v. AyalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. CareySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Rocco v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Buxton v. UllmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- First Connecticut Capital, LLC v. Homes of Westport, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Zollo v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- State v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.