Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Locklear v. Cummings

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 16, 2017No. COA16-1015Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBerger, Judge

Plaintiff failed to comply with Rule 4 of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure when she failed to serve her summons and complaint on Defendant Southeastern Regional Medical Center ("Southeastern") through a person authorized by law. Therefore, I concur with the majority that the trial court did not err when it granted Southeastern's *466motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(5) for insufficiency of service of process.

However, Plaintiff pleaded a claim of medical malpractice by a healthcare provider in her complaint, not a claim of ordinary negligence as asserted by the majority. Because…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thigpen v. NgoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Alston v. Granville Health SystemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. Alston v. HueskeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. Sanchez v. Cobblestone Homeowners Ass'n of Clayton, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  5. Bass v. Durham County Hospital Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API