United States v. Horowitz
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
The Government has brought this action to collect those penalties, and it moves for summary judgment on its claims. ECF No. 66.1 The Horowitzes have filed a cross-motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 68, arguing that the IRS reversed the 2014 penalties, such that the penalties the Government is trying to collect were not assessed until 2016, at which time they were untimely. They also argue that their failure to disclose was not willful-a point that would reduce the maximum penalties from 50% of the amount in the foreign account at the time of the violation to $ 10,000. Because the Horowitzes…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Goodman v. Praxair, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Jung Joo ParkDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
- Townsend v. Fleischmann's VinegarDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- United States v. GentgesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- United States v. KatholosDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022
- United States v. ParkDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.