Downing v. Wimble
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.
These parties exchanged farms. Each let the other have certain personal property then on the farms, and this suit is brought to recover damages for fraud in that deal. The action was brought against the defendant and his wife, but the court ordered a verdict for her, and the case went to the jury against Wimble, alone. As the basis of their claim, the plaintiffs relied upon fraudulent representations made by the defendant regarding four things: The hay, the beans, the water, and the cows.
The plaintiffs insist that the defendant cannot be heard in this Court because his exceptions were not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Crompton v. BeedleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910
- Cabot v. ChristieSupreme Court of Vermont · 1869
- Dent v. Bellows Falls & Saxtons River Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1922
- Newell Brothers v. HansonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
- Niles v. DanforthSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Giguere v. E. B. & A. C. Whiting Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1935
- Jenkins v. McCormickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- Girard Et Ux. v. Vt. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1931
- Land Finance Corp. v. Sherwin Electric Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1929
- Cheever v. AlbroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.