Legal Opinion
Newell Brothers v. Hanson
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 4, 1924PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
The action is tort to recover damages for the alleged fraud of the defendant in the sale of a pair of horses. Trial was by jury with verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs. The defendant argues exceptions to the admission of certain evidence, to the overruling of his motion for a directed verdict, and to certain portions of the charge.
The defendant is the son of C. H. Hanson, now deceased, who in his lifetime was engaged in buying and selling horses, and at the time of the sale in question was employed by his father in that business. It appeared in evidence that in December, 1918, C. H.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Strong v. RepideSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- National Park Bank v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Windram Manufacturing Co. v. Boston Blacking Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Crompton v. BeedleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910
- Rothmiller v. . SteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- White v. PepinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Lay v. Pettengill, NovotnySupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- Sutfin v. SouthworthSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- Bardwell v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1933
- Cheever v. AlbroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.