Legal Opinion
Kanner v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 8, 1927No. 380PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwan, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). It is urged that the indictment is wholly insufficient to support the conviction, because it does not set forth the offense with sufficient particularity to meet the requirements of criminal pleading. The point was raised at the beginning of the trial by a motion to dismiss.
The defendants’ contention is supported by United States v. Lynch (D. C.) 11 F.(2d) 298. On the other hand, Greenbaum v. United States, 280 F. 474 (C. C. A. 6), and Keslinsky v. United States, 12 F.(2d) 767 (C. C. A. 5), are cited by the prosecutor to show that the indictment was good as…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Horowitz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- Frieden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. KushnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- United States v. Kristopher Douglas WardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. John A. GrantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Leslie J. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Gerson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.