Legal Opinion

Darling Hardware v. United States (In Re Darling Hardware)

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided June 27, 1985No. 92-80428PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID E. NIMS, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge..

The United States has filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint because of a lack of jurisdiction and because the doctrine of sovereign immunity is an absolute bar to this proceeding.

As this is a related case and the parties have not consented to the bankruptcy judges entering any dispositive orders, this report of the findings of fact and the conclusions of law and recommendations is set forth below.

FACTS

Darling Hardware, a partnership (Darling) consisting of Paul Darling and Ada Darling, husband and wife, filed a voluntary petition under Title…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Edward E. Westlake v. William Lucas, Sheriff of Wayne CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  5. Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MDFC Equipment Leasing Corp. v. Robbins (In Re Interstate Motor Freight System)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1986
  2. Saunders v. Reeher (In Re Saunders)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Pullman Construction Industries, Inc. v. United States (In Re Pullman Construction Industries, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API