Legal Opinion

Sargent v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 2, 1992No. C3-91-2322PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

lone and Robert Sargent appeal from summary judgment in their action to recover underinsured motorist benefits from their insurer, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. In granting summary judgment, the court found that the claim was barred by the six-year contract statute of limitations. The Sargents argue the claim accrued, not with the accident, but when State Farm denied their demand for payment of underinsured benefits. We reverse and remand for trial.

FACTS

On September 30, 1983, Jerry Duerkop’s vehicle struck the vehicle in which appellant lone Sargent…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Niccum v. Hydra Tool Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Wittmer v. RuegemerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. O'Neill v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Oanes v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Berkshire Mutual Insurance v. BurbankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  3. Snyder v. CaseNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Nationwide Mut. Insurance v. ShillingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  5. Huttner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API