Legal Opinion

Youngs v. Choice

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 10, 1993No. B14-92-01052-CVPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEARS, Justice.

Appellant appeals pro se from two partial summary judgments granted in favor of Ap-pellee, and from an order of sanctions entered by the trial court. In three points of error, Appellant challenges the guardianship of her mother, May T. Youngs, the judicial partition-in-kind of Appellant’s real property, and the sanctions imposed by Judge Hutchi-son. We affirm all three orders.

On November 28, 1988, Maggie S. Choice, Appellant’s daughter, was appointed permanent guardian of May T. Youngs and of May Youngs’ estate. On August 11, 1989, the Guardian sued Appellant for: (1)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brown v. Texas Employment CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Taliaferro v. Texas Commerce BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. Vineyard v. Irvin, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
  4. Christensen v. HarkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Savell v. SavellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Logan v. McDaniel, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  2. Trimble v. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Service, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  3. Spies v. MilnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Lee v. HilerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Long v. Spencer, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API