Legal Opinion
Vineyard v. Irvin
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided May 27, 1993No. 13-93-142-CVPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FEDERICO G. HINOJOSA, Jr., Justice.
Ronald and David Vineyard, Co-executors of the estate of Ben Vineyard, petition this court to issue a writ of mandamus directing the Honorable I.J. Irvin, Presiding Judge of the County Court of Wharton County, to vacate his order denying them the right to file a supersedeas bond to suspend an order of public sale, and further directing him to allow them to suspend the order of sale without filing a superse-deas bond. We conditionally grant the writ.
Ben Vineyard’s estate owed $750,000 to Bank United of Texas, FSB, secured by a deed of trust on a piece…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Schultz v. Fifth Judicial District Court of Appeals at DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Andrews v. KochTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Ammex Warehouse Company v. ArcherTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- Huston v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Murphy v. McCloudDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re Estate of DanielDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Spies v. MilnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
- In Re Estate of Vigen, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
- Youngs v. ChoiceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.