United States v. James
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FELDER, Judge:
A general court-martial convicted the appellant of arson in violation of Article 126, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 926. The sentence approved by the convening authority requires this Court to review the case pursuant to Article 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C.A. § 866. The appellant asserts that reversal is required because the military judge failed to instruct the court members on evidence of uncharged misconduct.
An understanding of the basis for the conviction is necessary to resolve the issue. The incident occurred at the U. S. Army Hospital in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. LyleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- United States v. GravesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. GrundenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. KelleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. JanisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. WhitingU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980
- United States v. InfanteU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977
- United States v. SimmonsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977