Legal Opinion
Mullins v. Kaiser Steel Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 9, 1979No. Civ. A. 78-0650PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JUNE L. GREEN, District Judge.
The difficult questions before the Court concern the legality and enforceability of a clause of the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement of 1974 (hereinafter the “1974 Agreement”) 1 providing for a royalty payment to the United Mine Workers of America Health and Retirement Funds (hereinafter the “Funds”) on all bituminous coal procured or acquired by a signatory employer for use or for sale on which contributions to the Funds had not been made (hereinafter the “purchase-of-coal clause”). 2 The purchase-of-coal clause is only one component of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Connell Construction Co. v. Plumbers & Steamfitters Local Union No. 100Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kaiser Steel Corp. v. MullinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Julius Mullins v. Kaiser Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Waggoner v. R. McGray, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Electroglas, Inc. v. Dynatex Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1979
- Burke v. French Equipment Rental, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.