Waggoner v. R. McGray, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:
These consolidated appeals require us to decide whether a federal court may entertain an unfair labor practice defense to enforcement of a collective bargaining agreement in an action pursuant to section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185, before the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) has exercised primary jurisdiction over the unfair *1231labor practice charge. We hold that the NLRB’s primary jurisdiction precludes federal courts from acting as the initial arbiters of unfair labor practice charges in section 301 actions.
I
Appellants are…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Castaneda v. Dura-Vent Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Cement Masons Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Kirkwood-Bly, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1981
- Paul J. Baker v. Newspaper and Graphic Communications Union, Local 6Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Julius Mullins v. Kaiser Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Orange Belt District Council of Painters No. 48 v. Maloney Specialties, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.