Blakely v. State

The judge charged the jury in the instant case in part as follows: “Now in this case, gentlemen, the defendant contends that one of the State’s witnesses, to wit, -one Tillery, was what in the law would be considered as an accom*287pliee in this alleged crime, and I give you this principle of law, gentlemen, to govern you in considering the testimony of an accomplice: An accomplice is one who colludes and cbnnives and contrives and conspires with another and in some way aids and abets in the commission of a crime, and I charge you this principle of law: The testimony of a single witness is…