Legal Opinion

Mobile Insurance v. Columbia &c. R. R.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 25, 1894PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Before Izlar, J., Greenville, March, 1893. Action by the Mobile Insurance Company, ¿Etna Insurance ' Company, and Carroll & Stacy against the Columbia and Green-ville Railroad Company.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Chiee Justice MoIyer.

A brief statement of the conceded facts of this case will be necessary for a proper understanding of the questions raised by this appeal. On or about *409the 2d day of March, 1889, the plaintiffs, Carroll & Stacy, delivered to the defendant company, or rather to its lessee, the Richmond and Danville Railroad Company, 147 bales of cotton for shipment, and on the same day took out policies of insurance for different amounts on the said cotton from the following named companies, viz: the Mobile Insurance Company, the ¿Etna Insurance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mobile & Montgomery Railway Co. v. JureySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Hall & Long v. Railroad Cos.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Continental Insurance v. H. M. Loud & Sons Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ford v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Home InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Meyer Koulish Co. v. CannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Powell v. . Water Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. CampbellSupreme Court of Florida · 1932

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API