Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mathews

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 11, 1980PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant appeals from his conviction of arson of a dwelling house (G. L. c. 266, § 1) and claims error in the denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the Commonwealth failed to produce a light fixture which would exculpate him, and in the denial of his motions for a directed verdict. He also claims that he was denied due process because the prosecutor failed to keep a promise to dismiss the charges. We affirm.

1. The judge denied the motion to dismiss the indictment after the prosecutor asserted and offered to introduce evidence to prove that the fixture claimed…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. EllisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ShumanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. DeStefanoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. WardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. SouzaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. WilderMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API