Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Wilder

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 16, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The defendant has appealed from his conviction on an indictment charging him with statutory rape. G. L. c. 265, § 23. Prior to trial, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the Commonwealth had faded to preserve potentially exculpatory evidence. The defendant identified the lost evidence as the contents of a rape evidence kit and as clothing worn by the victim at the time of the incident. A Superior Court judge, after a hearing, denied the motion and filed a memorandum of decision that contained findings of fact in regard to the motion. We summarize the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Commonwealth v. St. GermainMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. MandevilleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. NealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. PisaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. NicholsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. MooreMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API