Commonwealth v. Wilder
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The defendant has appealed from his conviction on an indictment charging him with statutory rape. G. L. c. 265, § 23. Prior to trial, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the Commonwealth had faded to preserve potentially exculpatory evidence. The defendant identified the lost evidence as the contents of a rape evidence kit and as clothing worn by the victim at the time of the incident. A Superior Court judge, after a hearing, denied the motion and filed a memorandum of decision that contained findings of fact in regard to the motion. We summarize the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Commonwealth v. St. GermainMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. MandevilleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Commonwealth v. NealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Commonwealth v. PisaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. NicholsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- Commonwealth v. MooreMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985