Legal Opinion

Morehouse v. Haynes

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 9, 2010No. 060909915; A136871PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*484WOLLHEIM, J.

Plaintiff initiated this action seeking economic and noneconomic damages resulting from a car accident. Defendant moved for summary judgment on plaintiffs claim for noneconomic damages, arguing that plaintiff was barred from recovering noneconomic damages because plaintiff was uninsured at the time of the accident. In response, plaintiff alleged that defendant’s reckless driving caused the accident; therefore, plaintiff was not barred from recovering noneconomic damages. The trial court concluded that no reasonable jury could find that defendant drove recklessly, granted…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Williamson v. McKennaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Robinson v. Lamb's Wilsonville ThriftwayOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Burghardt v. OlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morehouse v. HaynesOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Morehouse v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. Morehouse v. HaynesOregon Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API