Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 16, 1990No. 72514Published

1DissentBlackmar, Chief Justice

I dissent from the vacation and remand. I would treat the appeal papers as an application for habeas corpus in this Court. Inasmuch as the principal opinion does not reach the merits I have not undertaken a detailed examination of the motion transcript and the appellant’s brief (the Attorney General being so confident that he did not brief the merits), but a preliminary screening leads me to the tentative view that the findings and conclusions of the trial court are well supported by the record and that the points raised for reversal are without merit. If we were to examine the merits and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Swenson v. BoslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. George C. Gilmore v. Bill Armontrout, George C. Gilmore v. Bill ArmontroutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  4. Sloan v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  5. Walter J. Blair v. Bill Armontrout, Walter J. Blair v. Bill ArmontroutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API