Swenson v. Bosler
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
Petitioner seeks certiorari from a judgment of the Court of Appeals holding invalid under the doctrine of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353, the State of Missouri’s former practice of deciding direct criminal appeals by convicted indigent defendants without the appointment of appellate counsel. We grant the writ of certiorari and, for the reasons below, we affirm.
Under Missouri criminal practice, a convicted defendant’s motion for new trial must set forth in detail his specific' grounds for relief; and in general, a Missouri appellate court may not consider on appeal questions which were…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
3Cited by281 opinions
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Halbert v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Whitehead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- United States v. PaleniusUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
276 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.