Legal Opinion

Dunahay v. Struzik

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1964No. 7161PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Justice.

Appellant, Helen Dunahay, brings this appeal from a judgment and verdict in favor of appellee, Frank L. Struzik, based on these facts. In December of 1957, one Overfield sued appellant for damages arising out of Tempe property sold to Overfield by appellant. On February 11, 1958, appellant sold another parcel of real estate, with improvements, a motel, located on 17th Avenue near Buckeye Road in the City of Phoenix, to Larry and Hazel Parker. Under the contract of sale, the Parkers agreed, in writing, to pay $11,151.02 to the appellant as consideration for the appellant’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Batty v. Arizona State Dental BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Sadler v. Arizona Flour Mills Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Chiricahua Ranches Co. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Employers Casualty Co. v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Honk v. KarlssonArizona Supreme Court · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. LinsenmeyerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. LittleArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  3. National Housing Industries, Inc. v. E. L. Jones Development Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  4. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. VagnozziArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Allstate Life Insurance v. Robert W. Baird & Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API