Wiener v. American Insurance Co. of Boston
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal. No. 93, Oct. T., 1908, by defendants, from order of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., Nov. T., 1909, No. 23, making absolute rule for judgment on answer of garnishee in case of Louis Wiener to use of J. R. Pringle v. The American Insurance Company of Boston and New Hampshire Fire Insurance Company. Rule for judgment on answers of garnishee. The facts appear by the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was order making absolute rule for judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rice, P. J.,
The questions for decision in this case arise upon the following-facts the statement of which we take from the paper-book of appellant’s counsel. Certain policies of insurance were issued in California to Louis Wiener, a resident of that state, by the American Fire Insurance Company, defendant, insuring property in San Francisco. A loss having occurred, a writ of foreign attachment was issued out of the court of common pleas of Philadelphia county, and the New Hampshire company served as garnishee. The defendant is a Massachusetts corporation, *221and has no agent or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. PennockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
- Fithian v. New York & Erie RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857
- Barr ex rel. Berst v. King & MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
- Christmas v. BiddleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fairchild Engine & Airplane Corp. v. Bellanca Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Bianco v. Concepts" 100", Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Bluestone v. Blowstein, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1934