Legal Opinion

Dowagiac Mfg. Co. v. Brennan

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Kentucky

Decided September 13, 1902PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Suit for infringement of letters patent No. 446,230, for a grain drill, granted to Will F. Hoyt February 10, 1891. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, District Judge.

On February xo, 1891, letters patent No. 446,230 were issued to W. F. Hoyt for “certain new and useful improvements in grain drills,” of which he subsequently made an assignment to the complainant. Two of the drawings accompanying his application and specifications are given, as they, in connection with what will be shown of the defendants’ structure, will sufficiently illustrate the propositions upon which the court thinks the decision of the case must turn. They are his Fig. 2, declared to be “a perspective view of a portion of the drill embodying my improved…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Keystone Bridge Co. v. Phoenix Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Fay v. CordesmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Prouty and Mears v. RUGGLESSupreme Court of the United States · 1842

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. De Long Hook & Eye Co. v. Francis Hook & Eye & Fastener Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API