Legal Opinion
De Long Hook & Eye Co. v. Francis Hook & Eye & Fastener Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York
Decided October 5, 1906No. 202PublishedCited by 1 opinion
In Equity. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
HAZEL, District Judge.
The bill charges infringement of letters patent No. 676,824, dated June 18, 1901, issued to Thomas De Q. Richardson, for hook and eye package, which patent is now owned by complainant. The patent relates to mounting invisible eyes on a carrier card associated with hooks and what are known as loop eyes. The specification and claims describe two rows of hooks and eyes thread-stitched to a card carrier and so-called invisible eyes also sewed or stitched thereto; the latter being secured to the card by one of the rows of stitching by which the hodks and loop eyes are…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. CramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- O. H. Jewell Filter Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Cleveland Foundry Co. v. Detroit Vapor Stove Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
- Boyer v. Keller Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
- Dowagiac Mfg. Co. v. Brennan & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- De Long Hook & Eye Co. v. Francis Hook & Eye & Fastener Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907