Legal Opinion
Aizuss v. Commonwealth Equity Trust
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 21, 1993No. Civ. S-93-712 DFL PANPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
LEVI, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are 163 shareholders of defendant Commonwealth Equity Trust (“CET”), a California Real Estate Investment Trust. They bring this action against CET, as well as several of CET’s past and present trustees, its investment advisors, attorneys, investment bankers, and accountant.
Plaintiffs assert twelve causes of action in their first amended complaint. Three of the claims for relief are based on federal law: (1) claims for violations of §§ 12(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “ ’33 Act”), against all defendants except KPMG…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Amtower v. Photon Dynamics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Betz v. Trainer Wortham & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Fezzani v. Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Betz v. Trainer Wortham & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Heide Betz v. Trainer Wortham & Company, Inc. David P. Como First Republic Bank, a Nevada Corporation Robert VileCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.