State v. Kirby
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LILLEHAUG, Justice.
Appellant Michael William Kirby was sentenced to 161 months in prison for first-degree possession of methamphetamine, Minn. Stat. § 152.021, subd. 2(a)(1) (2014). While his case was on appeal, the Drug Sentencing Reform Act (DSRA) took effect. See Act of May 22, 2016, ch. 160, 2016 Minn. Laws 576, The DSRA reduced the presumptive sentencing range under the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines drug offender sentencing grid for Kirby’s crime. Kirby asks that he be resentenced under the sentencing grid as amended by the DSRA. Because we conclude that such re-sentencing is…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Peugh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. ScovelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- State v. OttoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Bilbro v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- State v. StrobelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- Luna-Pliego v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.