Legal Opinion

Jackson v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 26, 2009No. Civil Action 07-0138 (RMU)PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Adopting in PART and Modifying in Part Magistrate Judge Facciola’s Report and Recommendation; Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees

RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the court upon the defendant’s objections to the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) issued by Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola on February 26, 2009. The plaintiffs brought suit under the Individuals with Disabilities Education and Improvement Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq., following two settlement agreements and thirty-six…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. National Ass'n of Concerned Veterans v. Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  5. Richlin Security Service Co. v. ChertoffSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Jackson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  2. Merrick v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  3. Dickens v. Friendship-Edison P.C.S.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. Irving v. D.C. Public SchoolsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. Irving v. D.C. Public SchoolsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API